Man as nature the Metatheory by 'Kjell Standal
approved by Inge J.Clausen email@example.com
• Do you know anything about the world around you? asks Don Juan of his student, Carlos Castaneda, at their second meeting.
• I know all sorts of things, answers Castaneda, thinking of his academic education.
• I mean, do you ever feel the world around
you? asks Juan. • I feel as much of the world around me as I can, replies Carlos.
• That is not enough. You must feel the whole thing, otherwise the
meaning of the world is lost, answers Juan.
Carlos Castaneda: The Teachings of Don Juan
often hears that man is considered as a part of nature. I would go further, because: As I see it, man is nature.
If man is nature,
every law which functions inexorably in nature also functions in and for man. This means in turn that every process that occurs in or between people must also exist in nature. Thus every interaction that occurs between people is also a reflection of natural
laws, in that it is nature that is interacting with nature.
Man appears as nature through the universal in nature. Man appears with his physical form in flesh
and blood, which has a brain, two arms, two legs and sensory apparatus. Here we can perceive the methodological approximation which I have chosen in order to understand man as nature, the dialectical thinking and awareness. What I mean by this is that to understand
is, as Don Juan points out, to enter into the total oneness.
This does not mean that understanding cannot be achieved by people who do not perceive
or have not entered into this oneness, but rather that the aware person who integrates his or her awareness into nature also enters a level of awareness that springs from a fundamental basis that perceives everything as a whole, both within the person as an
individual and also with respect to the individuals existential position in nature, in other words, the all, or what we might term the cosmos.
this signifies the interplay between the organismic form in which man appears and the true natural laws which are present in both man and nature.
this more clearly comprehensible, consider the following theses:
• All natural laws apply without exception, including to the human organism. •
All human activities constitute a search for inner connections which are based on natures consistent harmony, even at its most chaotic. • All human activities are an expression of natures motion, change and transformation. • All motion, change and
transformation springs out of and at the same time lays the groundwork for and maintains a pervasive internal consistency.
Man as nature the Metatheory
by 'Kjell Standal ﬁ
Translation approved by Inge J.Clausen firstname.lastname@example.org
04/27/03 10:53 Page 2 of 4
• Internal consistency and deep interrelationships on complex levels constitute
the core of all natural laws. • This applies to each and every interrelation between people in the same way that it applies to internal processes in the cognitive processes within man. All human interaction constitutes interplay with nature.
If we are to be able to look into nature and its cosmic form, I believe that, given our current state of knowledge and insight, we must turn to quantum physics
in order to find experience, theories and hypotheses concerning the fundamental states of nature.
From my standpoint it is necessary to formulate a
number of hypotheses regarding the laws of nature in such a way that they relate directly to man, who is nature. We derive thence a number of assertions drawn from quantum physics and interrelated with dialectics as an approximation of perception and theory.
- All natural laws, i.e. all the laws of reality that we have discovered and are discovering, merely tell us what is possible under specific circumstances, and
what is impossible under those same circumstances. These laws say nothing about what is really happening, or what will happen. They only tell us what could happen. The laws of nature are a collection of probability tables.
- Man as nature is an aware being. This means that we can look upon man as one of natures means of achieving self-awareness. This does not mean that nature had to produce man by necessity, but
rather that man arose as a chance occurrence in the stream of necessity. Subsequently this necessity represents natures evolution toward ever more complex forms of awareness, in which man may be viewed as one of many possible forms of awareness.
- Based on mans capacity for awareness, which I define as bringing his actions and thoughts into harmony with fundamental laws within and outside of his own existence, it
necessarily follows that nature has also brought forth the potential for the negation (the opposite) of awareness. In other words, a striving to cancel, to negate, to set ourselves outside of and above the logic of nature; destruction, and a pervasive destructive
counterpart to awareness. This can result in the extinguishing of the element of awareness in nature, including in some cases that which we have given the name of man.
The total oneness realised through the dialectical approximation between understanding in the sense of researching, revealing and perceiving the interrelationships in nature, while at the same time being able to feel the oneness of oneself in the world
and the oneness of the world in oneself, constitutes the actual basis for living in, with and for that oneness, while it simultaneously lives in, with and for us all. This is the real foundation of dialectical thinking about our existential situation.
Man as nature the Metatheory by 'Kjell Standal ﬁ
approved by Inge J.Clausen email@example.com 04/27/03 10:53
Page 3 of 4
If we take dialectics and quantum physics as our starting point, it is natural to consider that man initially arose as a result of
accretions or accumulations of potentials in nature that favoured the appearance of man as one of the potentials for awareness in nature. This was possible only because these potentials actually existed in reality. Man thus first arose as a potential, because
that potential existed in reality. This resulted in the real, in that man is nature because man actually existed in the realm of the possible by necessity.
means that man as nature is also expressed in the universal in man in his physical form. The universal in man is dialectical; the physical form gives rise to potentials for awareness, at the same time as these potentials for awareness have had a retroactive
impact on mans physical form.
Similarity resides in the universal; people are the same. But uniqueness is also evident in the universality of man. Difference
is inherent in this very similarity, and the very fact that all people are the same ensures their dissimilarity. The dissimilarity, the diversity in man is the actual foundation for the similarity. By acknowledging the similarity, we lay the foundation for
true dissimilarity, which is rooted in a deep awareness of belonging.
Man as nature also entails that men and women are the same, even though they are
just as different as any two men, two women, or adults and children. Oneness springs forth from our diversity, and all people thus comprise the basic conditions that underlie all people. Freedom, equivalence, equality, etc. thus do not constitute something
that women have to recapture, but rather something that we must all restore.
By acknowledging our similarity, we lay the basis for true dissimilarity.
Through true dissimilarity, people can be united into a dialectical whole, where the particular and the universal converge. This convergence transmutes into a new quality, a love story of reality, where all people are united in the one, and where the one is
united and differentiated from all others. This is true individuality.
The dialectical perception of the interrelationships between chance and necessity,
as seen in quantum physics, leads us back to the real conception of natures freedom, of human freedom.
In his active endeavours, man is far from being
some sort of plaything of blind fanatical chance, neither is he subject to immutable necessity. Man makes use of the chance element in actual events, and human freedom depends on the very fact that mans future can be determined because it is not predetermined.
The future unfolds in a manner that is partly determined by the past, but the past is absolutely not definitively determinative. Neither are individual aspects
of nature, nor is nature as an historical phylogenetic embodiment (man). This is evinced in the individual development phase, the ability of each individual to mould his or her own life and body, or as the evolution of species, i.e. the direction of human
Man as nature the Metatheory by 'Kjell Standal
Translation approved by Inge J.Clausen lobbyist@terrafirm